Academic writing is a kind of formal style of writing practiced mainly in the universities and in publications. Cohesion and coherence, which refer to intra-text connectedness, and the contextual fitness of the ideas, are the essential properties of the texts in academic writing so as to create them (the texts) more comprehensible. This article makes an attempt to acquaint the readers with academic writing; and introduce cohesion and coherence, which add quality in the standard of textuality in academic writing.

ResearchGate Logo

Discover the world's research

  • 20+ million members
  • 135+ million publications
  • 700k+ research projects

Join for free

1

Academic writing: Coherence and Cohesion in Paragraph

-- Ambika Prasad Poudel

Lecturer, Dhankuta M. Campus,

Dhankuta, Nepal

Abstract:

Academic writing is a kind of formal style of writing practiced mainly in the universities and in

publications. Cohesion and coherence, which refer to intra-text connectedness, and the contextual

fitness of the ideas, are the essential properties of the texts in academic writing so as to create

them (the texts) more comprehensible. This article makes an attempt to acquaint the readers with

academic writing; and introduce cohesion and coherence, which add quality in the standard of

textuality in academic writing.

1. Academic writing: An introduction

Academic writing, in a broad sense, is any writing assignment accomplished in an academic setting

such as writing books, research paper, conference paper, academic journal, and dissertation and

thesis. More specifically, it is writing activity performed to fulfill a requirement of a college,

university, conference, and publication. According to Irvin (2010), "Academic writing is always a

form of evaluation that asks you to demonstrate knowledge and show proficiency with certain

disciplinary skills in thinking, interpreting, and presenting" (p. 8). Murray (2005) defines academic

writing as 'the set of conventions used in publishing a paper, or in writing a thesis in a specific

discipline'. Oshima and Hogue (2007) view that academic writing is a kind of formal writing used

in high schools and a college classes, which is clearly different form personal and creative writing.

2

In a nutshell, academic writing is a style of written expression with specific intellectual boundaries,

and area of expertise.

Studying the definitions of academic writing given by the scholars, two distinctive features can be

identified; academic writing is: (i) discipline-specific, and (ii) evidence-based. The feature

'discipline- specific' refers to the fact that the academic writers strictly maintain the methods and

conventions of the discipline such as font, style, organization, or format of writing. In this way, a

good academic writing gives an identification of the writer's academic community. Similarly, the

character 'evidence- based' indicates t hat the statements and the viewpoints put forwarded in an

academic test are based on reliable sources. The assertions and the ideas of the writer are supported

by accurate and verifiable facts, and real world relevant examples.

Irvin (2010) uses the term 'literacy task' for 'academic writing', and he discusses two important

characteristics of this 'complex literacy task':

(a) Academic writing is an argument: Pr esentation of logical argument is one of the main

characteristic features of academic writing. The arguments are not for the purpose of winning

the disagreeing sides, but they (the arguments) are arranged so carefully that they support the

presentation of a viewpoint. The presentation " resembles a conversation between two people

who may not hold the same opinions, but they both desire better understanding of the subject

matter under discussion" (Irvin, 2010, p.10). In this way, a well academic writing holds the

great value of an organized argumentative presentation that consists of strong supporting

evidences.

(b) Academic writing is an analysis: Academic writing is the analytic interpretation of the

viewpoint. In the presentation, the writer needs to seek the answer of 'how and why questions'

much more than that of 'what questions'. According to Irvin (2010, p 10), such analytic

3

presentation involves three important activities: (i) engaging in an open inquiry where the

answer is not known at first, (ii) identifying the meaningful parts of the subject, and (iii)

examining the separate parts and determining how they relate each other.

Academic writing is a well-structured product with careful considerations to the factors like

audience, purpose, organization, style, flow, and presentation (Swales & Feak, 2012, p. 3); and

these factors are specific to who, why, and how questions. The audience, related to who question,

is the reader or readers of the message of the writer. The selection of content, organization,

explanation, example supplied, and vocabulary in the writing are determined according to the

nature of the audience. Similarly, the purpose is concerned with why question, and that guides the

focus of writing. Purpose is the intention of the writing, or the main goal or message of the writer.

Finally, the how question is concerned with the aspects such as organization, style, presentation,

and flow of ideas. Dividing the writing text into three parts- introduction, body, and conclusion-

helps make the writing well organized so that the readers feel comfortable in understanding the

ideas or issues. Likewise, the style of writing needs to be clear and precise with formal grammar

and formal vocabulary. Formal writing also needs avoidance of using the features like contraction,

negation, weak endings, multi-word verbs, or redundancies. Similarly, good academic writing

requires formal spelling, appropriate punctuation marks, and a good citation and referencing. It

should have fluent flow in the presentation of ideas in such that it maintains cohesion

(connectedness of the consecutive ideas using the techniques like repetition, substitution, and

transition), and coherence (occurrence of the ideas contextually in orderly sequence), which are

discussed in more detail in the following paragraphs.

4

2. Cohesion and coherence in academic writing:

The terms cohesion and coherence are related to making the sense of language in the text/discourse

analysis. Cohesion and coherence have significant role in the interpretation of message, and in the

negotiation of meaning in the discourse. A good academic writing requires a good combination of

cohesive ties and coherent features in the text. The paragraphs below attempt to introduce cohesion

and coherence, and their role in communicating messages in the text.

2.1 Cohesion:

Cohesion, like other semantic relations such as synonymy, antonymy, polysemy, is the relationship

of meaning of one item with another item/s in the text or discourse. According to Halliday and

Hasan (1976), "Cohesion refers to the relations of meaning that exist within the text, and is

expressed through the stratal organization of the text… It occurs where the interpretation of some

elements in the text is dependent on that of another" ( p 4). Taboada (2004) defines cohesion as

'the internal hanging together of the text'. To Yule (2008) 'C ohesion is the tie and connection that

exist within the text'. It is the part of the system of a language; a type of intra-sentence relation of

an item with either the preceding or following item/s in the text. In communication process,

cohesion gives insights into how the writer structures what he/she wants to convey.

Halliday and Hasan (1976) view that cohesion is expressed partly through the grammar and partly

through the vocabulary in the text. It is therefore, there can be two types of cohesion: grammatical

cohesion, and lexical cohesion. Grammatical cohesion is the cohesive tie that is expressed through

the grammatical system of a language such as reference, substitution, ellipsis, and conjunction.

Followings are the illustrative examples that show the cohesive tie in italics in each:

(i) Wow, how beautiful flower vessel! How much does it cost? [reference]

5

(ii) You are going to attend the party? If so , what about these agenda? [substitution]

(iii) We can buy those apples if we need to (buy those apples). [ellipsis]

(iv) He passed the exam. However , he did not obtain A plus. [conjunction]

Lexical cohesion, on the other hand, is 'the cohesive effect achieved by the selection of

vocabulary' (Halliday & Hasan, 1976, p 274). Lexical cohesion can be realized in reiteration (using

the same, or semantically related vocabulary such as repetition, synonym, superordinate, general

word) and in collocation (co-occurrence of lexical items). Followings are the examples showing

cohesive tie in italics.

(i) Reiteration: I have a puppy . The puppy is black. [Repetition]

I have a puppy. The pup is black. [Synonym]

I have a puppy. The animal is black. [Superordinate]

I have a puppy. The baby dog is black. [General word]

(ii) Collocation: With their hammer-nail relation, the boys won the match.

2.2 Coherence:

A text is formed not only with the structured string of words, but also with the contextual

occurrence of the sentences. Coherence, generally, is the contextual appearance of the utterances

in the text. More specifically, it is the contextual fitness of in the text that contributes in

understanding the meaning or message. According to Taboada (2004), "Coherence is the hanging

together of the text with relation to its context of situation or culture" (p. 158). Yule (2008) views,

"Coherence is everything fitting together well, and it is not something that exists in words or

structures, but something that exists in people" (p 126). Coherence is the result of the interpretation

of the meaning of the text, and it depends on the relation between the audience and the text

6

(Tanskanen, 2006). It is therefore, the coherence of a text can be perceived only if the receiver's

background knowledge is sufficient enough to interpret the linkage of messages in the discourse.

The examples below show the coherent, and non-coherent texts:

(i) A text with coherence: A: Did you bring the car?

B: Yes, I brought it yesterday.

(ii) A text with no coherence: A: Where did you go last week?

B: That sounds good. My brother paints it.

2.3 Coherence and cohesion for communication:

We have discussed that cohesion is the intra-text connectedness of the items, and coherence is the

appropriateness of the contextual occurrence of the text so as to make the sense of the message

conveyed. In cohesion, the surface elements appear connectedly, whereas in coherence, the

elements of knowledge or sense appear to form conceptual connectivity.

Some researchers such as Morgan and Sellner (1980), Carrell (1982) claim that cohesion is not

sufficient enough to make a text connected or appear a unified whole. It is because a highly

cohesive text with lots of connections and ties may cause difficulty in the interpretation of the

message as Yule (2008, p 126) presents the following example:

My father bought a Lincoln convertible. The car driven by the police was red. That color

does not suit her. She consists of three letters.

Coherence, on the other hand, has important role for creating unity between or among the

propositional units in the text. Without coherence, a set of utterances cannot form a text, no matter,

how many cohesive ties appear between the utterances. To show a text with no cohesive ties, bu t

perfectly coherent, Widdowson (1978) presents following example (as cited in Yule 2008, p 127):

7

A: That's the telephone.

B: I'm in bath.

However, in spite of the fact is that the importance of cohesion, in contrast to coherence, may have

been criticized; many researchers (such as Hasan, 1984, Tanskanen, 2006, Hover, 1997) view that

the contribution of cohesion to unity cannot be challenged. Tanskanen (2006) claims that although

coherence without cohesion might be possible, it may actually be quite uncommon to find a

coherent text having no cohesive links in real language data. Hasan (1984) insists, "The perceived

coherence depends upon the interaction of cohesive devices called cohesive harmony; the denser

the cohesive harmony of a text, the more coherent it will be judged" (as cited in Tanskanen, 2006,

p 20). The role of cohesive ties in a text is that they predispose the readers to find the coherence,

and ultimately to interpret the message. As Tanskanen (2006) states, cohesion and coherence are

independent, but are intertwined so as to create more comprehensible texts.

3. Conclusion:

Academic writing is a style of formal writing used in the universities, colleges; or in publications.

In addition to who, why, and what aspects (that are related to audience, purpose, and content of

writing respectively); how aspect, that is concerned with organization, style, presentation, and flow

of ideas; is more crucial in academic writing. For helping the readers in constructing meanings

from the text, cohesion and coherence have significant role as they create a text such that it has

contextual adjustment of ideas connectedly in orderly sequence.

Both cohesion and coherence contribute for maintaining unity in the paragraphs in academic

writing. It is coherence-the contextual fitness of the sentences-that is more significant for making

8

sense of the text for the readers. However, a text with cohesive ties and coherence is more

comfortable for the readers to comprehend and interpret the message of the writer.

9

References

Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. Tesol Quarterly 16 (4), pp 479-488.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Hongkong: Longman.

Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed) Understanding Reading

Comprehension: Cognition, Language, and the Structure of Prose. Newark, DE:

International Reading Association. pp 181-219.

Hoover, M. L. (1997). Effects of textual and cohesive structure on discourse processing. Discourse

Process 23(2 ). pp 193-220.

Irvin, L. L. (2010). What is academic writing? In C. Lowe and P. Zemliansky (Eds) Writing

Spaces: Readings on Writing volume 1. Indiana: Parlor press. pp 3-17.

Morgan, J. L., & Sellner, M. B. (1980). Discourse and linguistic theory. In R. J. Spiro and W. F.

Brewer (Eds) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive

Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp

165-200.

Murray, R. (2005). Writing for academic journals. New York: OUP.

Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing (3rd ed). USA: Longman

Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks

and Skills . 3rd ed. Michigan: Michigan UP.

10

Taboada, M. T. (2004). Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and

Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Tanskanen, S. (2006). Collaborating towards coherence. Amsterdam: John B. Publishing Co.

Widdowson, H. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: OUP.

Yule, G. (2008). The study of language. (3rd ed). New Delhi: CUP.

... Beberapa tantangan yang dapat muncul dalam kegiatan menulis siswa adalah siswa tidak memiliki ide bagaimana mulai menulis teks, siswa kurang menguasai kosa kata dan tata bahasa, dan siswa tidak menulis teks atau paragraf secara koheren dan kohesi. Hal yang sama diungkapkan oleh Poudel (2018) yang menyatakan bahwa koherensi dan kohesi teks sangat penting untuk memahami dan menafsirkan pesan secara tertulis. Untuk mengatasi tantangan di atas, sangatlah penting bagi guru untuk terlibat dalam proses penulisan siswa, yaitu dengan memberikan umpan balik atau feedback dalam tulisan siswa. ...

  • Sri Widarsih
  • Didi Suherdi Didi Suherdi

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti jenis feedback tertulis yang diberikan oleh guru pada tulisan siswa sekolah menengah atas kelas sepuluh di SMAN 1 Sukatani tahun pelajaran 2019/2020. Instrument yang digunakan adalah dokumen analisis untuk meneliti jenis feedback tertulis yang diberikan oleh guru bahasa Inggris pada hasil tulisan siswa kelas sepuluh jurusan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS) dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA). Temuan mengungkapkan bahwa kedua guru menggunakan feedback tertulis yang berbeda pada tulisan siswa. Guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPA cenderung menggunakan feedback tertulis langsung dan guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPS menggunakan jenis feedback tidak langsung. Dapat disimpulkan alasan perbedaan jenis feedback tertulis yang digunakan karena guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPA berpendapat bahwa feedback langsung lebih rinci dan lebih cepat dipahami siswa. Sedangkan guru yang mengajar di jurusan IPS berpendapa bahwa dengan memberikan feedback tertulis tidak langsung dapat mendorong siswa untuk berfikir dan membuat siswa memiliki keingintahuan yang lebih tentang kesalahan yang mereka tulis dan siswa bisa menanyakannya ke guru.

... Moreover, academic writing requires having proper citation as well as referencing, correct punctuation and formal spelling with a fluent flow of ideas that have coherence and cohesion. In fact, coherence and cohesion create a linguistic sense in the discourse or text, help interpret the message, and negotiate the meaning present in the texts (Poudel 2018). ...

Writing requires a suitable and strategic use of language with communicative potential and structural correctness. The use of coherence and cohesion helps create communicative potential and structural correctness in texts. This study aims to investigate the use of cohesive items in the abstracts of Pakistani research articles and thereby determine what type of cohesive items are frequently used by writers. In addition, the study aims to know what functions the said writers achieve through the most frequently used cohesive items. For this purpose, 50 abstracts were retrieved from two famous Pakistani research journals (25 articles per journal), which were developed into a corpus for the study and analysed through AntConc. 3.4.4.0. The results revealed that Pakistani research writers used reference items the most frequently to achieve "directive" as well as "referential" functions. On the basis of these findings, the study concluded that Pakistani research article writers organised information in abstracts using reference items the most frequently and they were mainly concerned with directive as well as referential functions of meaning. The results also showed that the said writers organised texts on a syntactic level only, which implied that they should organise texts on a semantic level also. This would be possible with the use of repetition devices.

  • Vicente J Leuterio
  • Trixie Cubillas Trixie Cubillas

The study aimed to determine and analyze the common errors committed by the grade six pupils in writing essays in English in accordance to Corder's linguistic levels namely; graphological, lexico-semantic and grammatical. It also aimed to determine the error density index of the pupils and the challenges they met in writing essay in English. It made use of a mixed method design and it utilized the corpus-based method where the primary sources of data were the essay compositions of the pupils. There were 79 pupils who participated in writing essay composition based on theme provided by the researchers. The findings of this study revealed that the frequency of errors committed by the grade six pupils in essays in English fell on the graphological level obtaining a total of 2, 177 error counts or 43% of the total number of errors. Grammatical level is second in rank obtaining 1, 974 counts or 39% of the total number of errors. While lexico-semantic level has obtained 911 counts or 18% of the total number of errors. For the level of Error Density Index (EDI), results revealed that majority of the grade six pupils' level is ‗very problematic' which implied that the density of errors committed by the pupils is very alarming. As to the challenges met by the pupils in writing essay in English, pupils' lack of vocabulary, Mother tongue interference, lack of writing activities, and textbooks were identified. These factors have contributed to the grade six pupils' errors committed in writing essay in English as justified by the responses of the pupils and teachers in the interview. Thus, a Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) is designed by the researchers which may be used by teachers to improve the essay writing skills of their pupils.

This corpus-based study aimed at investigating Concluding Transition Signals' (CTS) frequency, functions, and grammatical formula within the academic texts. Accordingly, nine CTSs were taken based on thetaxonomy described in the introduction section. Then, 400 different samples of CTSs were selected and analyzed within the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) both qualitatively and quantitatively. Findings revealed that the frequency of concluding terms were varied based on both the nature of the CTSs and the genre in which they were employed. The first three most widely used CTSs were "thus," "finally" and "in short" with a high frequency of occurrence in "Geography" and "Social Sciences" genres. Moreover, the analysis indicated that these nine terms can have diverse textual functions from which "summarizing of the paper's main points," "suggesting the results or consequences" and "evoking a vivid image of the discussion" were the most prevailing ones. Furthermore, the results implied that CTSs were mostly used in the initial position of the main clause rather than within the subordinate clauses. Comparing to subordinate or relative clauses coming after the concluding terms, main clauses are also preferred to be used by the authors. The study includes some extracts from the academic texts and provides implications regarding the academic writing instructions.

  • Patricia L. Carrell

The purpose of this paper is to criticize the concept of cohesion as a measure of the coherence of a text. The paper begins with a brief overview of Halliday and Hasan's (1976) cohesion concept as an index of textual coherence. Next, the paper criticizes the concept of cohesion as a measure of textual coherence in the light of schema-theoretical views of text processing (e.g. reading) as an interactive process between the text and the reader. This criticism, which is drawn from both theoretical and empirical work in schema theory, attempts to show that text-analytic procedures such as Halliday and Hasan's cohesion concept, which encourage the belief that coherence is located in the text and can be defined as a configuration of textual features, and which fail to take the contributions of the text's reader into account, are incapable of accounting for textual coherence. The paper concludes with a caution to second language (EFL/ESL) teachers and researchers not to expect cohesion theory to be the solution to EFL/ESL reading/writing coherence problems at the level of the text.

  • Michael L Hoover Michael L Hoover

Results from two experiments are presented that tested the hypothesis that processing is facilitated when there is a correspondence between discourse focus and two types of markers of text coherence: cohesion (pronominalization) and textual structure (topicalization). Participants read well‐structured stories in which the coherence marking in the target sentence was either congruent or incongruent with the discourse, or they read randomized lists of sentences drawn from the stories, in which the target sentence appeared in the same serial position, In all conditions, the local environment was held constant. Results from some of the stories indicated that there was a facilitation in reading time for congruent text marking for both cohesion and textual structure. However, this facilitation effect manifested itself at different points in the sentence: at the end of the sentence for congruent pronominalization, and within the sentence for congruent topi‐calization. A slight modification of the original hypothesis can account for the stories that did not show this pattern of results. These results strongly suggest that: (1) readers are highly sensitive to coherence marking devices; and (2) strictly local coherence models cannot completely account for what readers are doing as they read well‐structured discourses. These findings are consistent with models of discourse processing that assume that readers are using coherence marking in the text to help them construct a semantic representation of the discourse.

Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language, and the Structure of Prose

  • R Hasan

Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed) Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language, and the Structure of Prose. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. pp 181-219.